• Exclusive assignments give the assignee the right to exploit the work to the exclusion of any other person (including the assignor himself) and, unless otherwise agreed, to grant non-exclusive authorizations to third parties.

• The transferee may exclusively transfer to others their right with the express consent of the transferor.

• This consent is not necessary when the transmission is carried out by a dissolution or change of ownership of the cessionary company.

• The non-exclusive assignee may use the work according to the terms of the assignment and in concurrence with both the other transferees and the transferor themselves. Your right is non-transferable, except in the case of a dissolution or change of ownership of the cessionary company.

• Non-exclusive authorizations granted by management entities for the use of their repertoires will, in any case, be unviable.

In relation to salaried authors and as established by thearticle 51 LPI :

• The transfer to the employer of the exploitation rights of the work created under a labor relationship shall be governed by what has been agreed upon in the contract, which must be made in writing.

• In the absence of a written agreement, it is presumed that the rights of exploitation have been granted exclusively and with the necessary scope to carry out the habitual activity of the employer at the time of delivery of the work carried out in virtue of this labor relationship.

• The employer can never use or have the work in a sense or for purposes other than those derived from what is established in the previous points.

• The entities of management of intellectual property rights are private non-profit associations that are dedicated to the defense and collective management of the exploitation rights of the works of its associates.

• Management entities (articles 147-159)
• Sanctioning regime of management entities (articles 190-192)

• La Intellectual Property Commission You can address against the infringers of intellectual property rights against those services (links pages) that facilitate the description or location of works offered without authorization, carrying out an active activity not neutral (without limitation to activities merely of technical intermediation). Additionally, it is not taken into account if these links are initially provided by the recipients of the service.

• Repeated breach (two or more times) of requirements for withdrawal of content declared violators may be sanctioned with a fine between 30.000 and 300.000 euros.

• The rights management entities are subject to more comprehensive control by the Public Administration.

• A model of "single window"With which the billing and payment of the amounts that the users have to pay to the entities of collective management of rights is centralized.

• Is modified 1 / 2000 Law, January 7, of Civil Procedure  so that a judge can be asked for the identification of a service provider that spreads on a large scale and unauthorizedly protected content.

• The author has all the moral and exploitation right and therefore can deposit his work, unless he has ceded exclusively to a third person the right of exploitation of that work (for example, to a magazine editor).

• In general, when it is published in a magazine, the right of reproduction and distribution to the publisher is transferred. Most international commercial publishers, however,self archiving in digital deposits with possible limitations (for example, it is not allowed to upload the pdf version published in the journal, or it is only allowed once a specific time limit has expired).

• If the author has transferred his exploitation rights exclusively to a third person (publisher), the author can not upload the document to the repository without his permission. When submitting an article to a periodical publication, authors should be aware of whether at any time they have accepted the assignment of some of their rights to the editor of the magazine, especially the right of public communication, which is what would allow you to upload your article to the web or deposit you deem most appropriate. If the opposite is not expressly stated, the exploitation rights are the author's.

• In case the author does not know in what situation he has transferred his exploitation rights, you must consult the Acceptance sheet of the publication rules or the assignment sheet of rights, in the case of magazines or congresses, or the editing contract in the case of monographs.

• If this information is not available, the databases can be consulted Sherpa / Romeo  o Our wines are dedicated to the theatre, therefore are named by famous male and female play roles., where we have analyzed the copyright policies of the main scientific-technical commercial publishers.

As established by97 article of the LPI:

• The person or group of natural persons who created it, or the legal entity that is contemplated as the holder of the copyright in the cases provided by law, is considered author of a computer program.

• If it is a collective work, it is considered author, unless otherwise agreed by the natural or legal person that edits it and disseminates it under its name. On the other hand, if the computer program is a unitary result of the collaboration between several authors, the copyright corresponds to all of them in the proportion that they determine.

If a salaried worker creates a computer program, in the exercise of their functions or under the instructions of their employer, the ownership of exploitation rights (both of the source program and the object program) correspond exclusively to the " businessman unless otherwise agreed.

For more information about works in collaboration  and the collective works , you can consult the following sources

• http://www.legaltoday.com/opinion/articulos-de-opinion/es-lo-mismo-participar-en-una-obra-colectiva-que-en-una-obra-en-colaboracion
• http://queaprendemoshoy.com/tipos-de-obras-i-obras-en-colaboracion-o-de-autoria-conjunta-y-obras-colectivas/